Some slightly related from Technorati and Google.
[Isteve.com] Nov 2003 iSteve Web Exclusives Blog by Steve Sailer: any conspiracy, although he seemed to prefer leftists ones if he had his druthers. He went around initiating contact with potential conspirators, most famously, moving to Russia so he could work for the KGB. Typically, the would-be conspirators figured out sooner or later that Oswald was ineffectual at any kind of organized work. He was just a dangerous wacko who wanted to get into the history books by shooting somebody famous, and so they never did much with him.
[Disinfo.com] Rockets Redglare! :: Disinformation :: The gateway to the ...: THE BATTLE AGAINST "FREE" TRADE Watch Greg Spotts discuss CAFTA on Lou Dobbs Tonight. Learn more with the film American Jobs and the book CAFTA and Free Trade by Greg Spotts.
[Radio.weblogs.com] Andrew Jackson's main weblog: All you need to know is that they want to destroy civilisation for invalid reasons. You do not need to romanize, pronounce, punctuate, spell and accent every front group they concoct correctly and politely.
[Stommel.tamu.edu] Ethel the Blog: One wonders how Clinton could possibly be responsible for something that started at least 8 years before he even ran for office. While I'm sure the ultra-loony right could concoct some hare-brained and causality-shattering scenario to ostensibly prove Clinton's culpability, I'll have to invoke Ockham's Razor and assume that since it happened during Reagan's adminstration it's the fault of Reagan's administration. You know, the administration reknowned for it's big, manly, chest-thumping, total command of national security and foreign policy issues. But, to be fair, perhaps Ollie North was too busy working cocaine deals to give much thought to security issues at Los Alamos.
[Stommel.tamu.edu] Ethel the Blog: Some months ago, in an article in the Saturday Review, I ventured that the delinquency manifest by this sort of evaluation might be demonstrated if one were to imagine the critical response to an improvisation which, through its style and texture, suggested that it might have been composed by Joseph Haydn. (Let's assume it to be brilliantly done and most admirably Haydn-esque.) I suggested that if one were to concoct such a piece, its value would remain at par -- that is to say, at Haydn's value -- only so long as some chicanery were involved in its presentation, enough at least to convince the listener that it was indeed by Haydn. If, however, one were to suggest that although it much resembled Haydn it was, rather, a youthful work of Mendelssohn, its value would decline; and if one chose to attribute it to a succession of authors, each of them closer to the present day, then -- regardless of their talents or historical significance -- the merits of this same little piece would diminish with each new identification. If, on the other hand, one were to suggest that this work of chance, of accident, of the here and now, was not by Haydn but by a master living some generation or two before his time (Vivaldi, perhaps), then this work would become -- on the strength of that daring, that foresight, that futuristic anticipation landmark in musical composition.
Reflected tags on Technorati: Blog, SEM, SEO Files
